[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Feedback on lilypondblog article
From: |
Noeck |
Subject: |
Re: Feedback on lilypondblog article |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Apr 2015 21:25:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 |
Dear Urs,
>> Yes, I wouldn't have thought of that possibility. Of course the
>> function should fallback to not trying to include a stylesheet then.
>
> Fixed in
> https://github.com/openlilylib/openlilylib/commit/37b6fef70eae3ecaa804fea03e0d711e931468f7
Thanks!
> Hm, did you try it out?
and
>> A help message (-h) would be nice -> how about using argparse? (Not
>> necessary for this low amount of options though.)
>
> Huh?
>
> python install-lily-fonts -h
> usage: install-lily-fonts [options]
> ...
I used
https://github.com/openlilylib/openlilylib/blob/master/fonts/install-lily-fonts.py
instead of
https://github.com/openlilylib/openlilylib/blob/master/py/font-install/install-lily-fonts
The fonts/install-lily-fonts.py is probably only a remainder from times
before the restructuring. This file duplication confuses me and I should
probably wait until it is completed and cleaned up, because I only
distract you from great work when trying to understand the current
temporary state.
Then things are different:
- The download is easy
- My wish for enhancement is already implemented (multiple targets)
Anything more clever would be more difficult to understand.
- However it did not accept a folder with the extracted content of
gutenberg-1939.zip as a font directory. Is the catalog necessary?
Cheers,
Joram
- Feedback on lilypondblog article, Noeck, 2015/04/14
- Re: Feedback on lilypondblog article, Urs Liska, 2015/04/14
- Re: Feedback on lilypondblog article, tisimst, 2015/04/14
- Re: Feedback on lilypondblog article, Noeck, 2015/04/15
- Re: Feedback on lilypondblog article, Urs Liska, 2015/04/15
- Re: Feedback on lilypondblog article, Urs Liska, 2015/04/15
- Re: Feedback on lilypondblog article,
Noeck <=
- Re: Feedback on lilypondblog article, Urs Liska, 2015/04/16
- Re: Feedback on lilypondblog article, Noeck, 2015/04/16
- Re: Feedback on lilypondblog article, Urs Liska, 2015/04/16
- Re: Feedback on lilypondblog article, Noeck, 2015/04/16