[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "procedure" vs. "function"
From: |
Richard Shann |
Subject: |
Re: "procedure" vs. "function" |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Apr 2015 14:08:26 +0100 |
On Sat, 2015-04-18 at 13:11 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
>
>
> Am 18. April 2015 12:15:08 MESZ, schrieb Richard Shann
> <address@hidden>:
> >On Sat, 2015-04-18 at 11:51 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I just stumbled over a terminology issue: are "procedure" and
> >"function"
> >> synonyms in Scheme or do they refer to different things?
> >The Guile reference manual uses the term procedure
>
> So what does it mean when we have
> define-scheme-function
That is the name of scheme procedure (or macro actually) that the
LilyPond developers chose; I think the Guile manual is consistent in
calling them procedures.
Richard
Re: "procedure" vs. "function", Michael Hendry, 2015/04/18
Re: "procedure" vs. "function", David Nalesnik, 2015/04/18