[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Do we really offer the future?
From: |
Jim Long |
Subject: |
Re: Do we really offer the future? |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Apr 2015 20:19:37 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 04:45:20PM +0200, Gilles wrote:
> If and when "big" publishers use LilyPond, the result will be more
> restricted access (through cost) to culture (because they won't release
> their proprietary contents).
Forgive me if I've missed important bits of this conversation, but
I'm not I understand your point here -- can you expand on this
statement? Why do you feel that large-scale adoption of OSS (in
general) will restrict and increase the cost of cultural access?
- Re: Do we really offer the future?, (continued)
Re: Do we really offer the future?, Federico Bruni, 2015/04/20
Re: Do we really offer the future?, Gilles, 2015/04/20
Re: Do we really offer the future?, Kieren MacMillan, 2015/04/21
Re: Do we really offer the future?,
Jim Long <=
Re: Do we really offer the future?, Andrew Bernard, 2015/04/19