[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Do we really offer the future?
From: |
Johan Vromans |
Subject: |
Re: Do we really offer the future? |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Apr 2015 14:20:34 +0200 |
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:52:10 +0200
Urs Liska <address@hidden> wrote:
> > One way is to enter your music in parallel
>
> But one has to admit that this more or less requires you to enter your
> music accordingly *beforehand*.
> And I think with this you'd deprive yourself of significant advantages
> that LilyPond's horizontal apporach has regarding stability.
I would very much like to understand what you mean.
Simplified, I see no functional differences between
voiceA = { Abar1 | Abar2 | Abar3 | Abar4 }
voiceB = { Bbar1 | Bbar2 | Bbar3 | Bbar4 }
voiceC = { Cbar1 | Cbar2 | Cbar3 | Cbar4 }
voiceD = { Dbar1 | Dbar2 | Dbar3 | Dbar4 }
and
\parallelMusic #'(voiceA voiceB voiceC voiceD) {
Abar1 | Bbar1 | Cbar1 | Dbar1 |
Abar2 | Bbar2 | Cbar2 | Dbar2 |
Abar3 | Bbar3 | Cbar3 | Dbar3 |
Abar4 | Bbar4 | Cbar4 | Dbar4 |
}
Both have pros and cons. A relatively straighforward tool (e.g., python-ly,
as mentioned) should be able to convert one form into another and vice
versa.
-- Johan
Re: Do we really offer the future?, Richard Shann, 2015/04/22
Re: Do we really offer the future?, Trevor Daniels, 2015/04/22
Re: Do we really offer the future?, Kieren MacMillan, 2015/04/22
- Re: Do we really offer the future?, Urs Liska, 2015/04/22
- Re: Do we really offer the future?, PMA, 2015/04/22
- Re: Do we really offer the future?, Kieren MacMillan, 2015/04/22
- Re: Do we really offer the future?, Simon Albrecht, 2015/04/22
- Re: Do we really offer the future?, Kieren MacMillan, 2015/04/22
- Re: Do we really offer the future?, Urs Liska, 2015/04/22
- Re: Do we really offer the future?, Kieren MacMillan, 2015/04/22
- Re: Do we really offer the future?, Calixte Faure, 2015/04/22
- Re: Do we really offer the future?, Urs Liska, 2015/04/22