|
From: | N. Andrew Walsh |
Subject: | Re: Fedora 22 |
Date: | Fri, 1 May 2015 19:12:07 +0200 |
Could you post the verbose output, please?You talk about 2.19.20: is this self-compiled?
--
Phil Holmes----- Original Message -----From: N. Andrew WalshTo: Jon CieslaSent: Friday, May 01, 2015 5:33 PMSubject: Re: Fedora 22except, as I've said, I'm running lilypond 2.19.20 on a gentoo system with ghostscript 9.15, and I have this same problem. So this isn't limited to the versions/distros listed here.Cheers,A
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Jon Ciesla <address@hidden> wrote:
Hi, Fedora Lilypond maintainer. It's broken on 2.19.19, with Ghostscript 9.16 which is in f22. 9.15 works. There's a bug open agains ghostscript in Fedora.
--
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
I understand that we now deliver LilyPond with Ghostscript 9.15, and my windows installation shows 9.15 when I run it. Your version shows 9.16, which may be the problem. Do you know where this is being picked up from?
--
Phil Holmes----- Original Message -----From: Scott MillerSent: Friday, May 01, 2015 1:38 PMSubject: Re: Fedora 22Another confirmed, Fedora 22. The Fedora repo supplied lilypond 2.19.18 fails to compile anything. Here is a log:
http://fpaste.org/217530/
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
------------------------------------------------
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |