[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fedora 21 and lilypond 2.19.19
From: |
Martin Tarenskeen |
Subject: |
Re: Fedora 21 and lilypond 2.19.19 |
Date: |
Sat, 2 May 2015 21:36:44 +0200 (CEST) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.11 (LFD 23 2013-08-11) |
On Sat, 2 May 2015, Andrew Bernard wrote:
Is this a known issue? Should I stay safely on Mint? I see recent discussion
about difficulties with Fedora 22 and
ghostscript.
I have LilyPond 2.19.19 working on Fedora 21 running without problems, and
on Fedora 22 I can't compile any *.ly file at all. So it seems you are
having a different problem.
I think we must be careful to keep different (LilyPond) issues that people
are reporting here separate, if we are not really sure that they are in
any way related. Or if weknow they are different issues.
I am summing up some of the issues I have seen in the list that we really
should kee seperated for now:
- Fedora 21 vs Fedora 22
- Ghostscript 9.15 vs 9.16 in combination with LilyPond 2.19.19
- problems with new fontconfig
- Ghostscript using "lines.ps" from the Ghostscript search path instead of
the filename specified when calling gs.
- LilyPond brutally overwrites an already existing xxxx.ps file when an
xxxx.ly inputfile is used to create a xxxx.pdf file, (instead of
properly creating a decent temporary filename)
- and now the issue from Andrew Bernard
These are really different subjects, that sometimes might, or might not,
be related.
Let's keep the bugreports and discussion clean and clear. I started the
discussion, and I feel the need to say this.
--
MT