[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A slur across a line break with change of clef in another staff gene
From: |
Richard Shann |
Subject: |
Re: A slur across a line break with change of clef in another staff generates bad output |
Date: |
Sat, 30 May 2015 18:53:57 +0100 |
On Sat, 2015-05-30 at 09:46 -0700, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
> Richard,
>
> Tried putting the "\clef treble" before the a8.
yes, it is fairly sensitive to minor changes...
I think I have found the answer to my other question - the manual says
that \shape can take a list of two sets of displacements.
\shape #'((0.0 . 0.0) (1 . 1.2) (3 . 1.2) (4 . 1) ()) Slur
Richard
> Looks good to me, yet I do not know what other constraints you have.
>
> Mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Richard Shann
> Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2015 9:11 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: A slur across a line break with change of clef in another staff
> generates bad output
>
> Attached is a bit of LilyPond which has a slur over a line break. At the same
> moment the clef is changing in the lower staff. The result is a horribly
> broken slur start in the top staff.
> I blindly applied the dragging-the-shape on this curve which generated the
> commented out offsets. This results in something half-way acceptable. The bug
> is sensitive to all sorts of things I think - this was the most I managed to
> pare it down - reducing the font size made it go away for example.
>
> Questions:
> Is there special syntax for altering the shapes of the half-slurs at
> the end and beginning of the line?
> Is this a known bug?
>
> Richard
>
>