Re: Accidentals in cadenzas after barlines

[Urs Liska]

Am 03.06.2015 um 15:55 schrieb Peter Toye:

Thanks both David and Urs. Urs's didn't work too well as it still left space for the non-existent accidental. David's solution worked much better.

This is interesting because in the development version this isn't the case anymore.
Urs

Regards,

Peter
mailto:address@hidden
www.ptoye.com

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user