[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sharping naturals
From: |
Urs Liska |
Subject: |
Re: sharping naturals |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Jul 2015 19:40:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
K-9 Mail for Android |
Am 23. Juli 2015 19:29:38 MESZ, schrieb Malte Meyn <address@hidden>:
>
>
>Am 23.07.2015 um 19:15 schrieb Christopher R. Maden:
>> They will look different, but will be the same notes. The music
>> describes itself; the key signature affects presentation.[*]
>>
>That’s true and I think that this is one of LilyPonds strengths as it
>allows to be very flexible with transposing, quoting, changing key
>signatures etc.
I think so too.
However, there *are* programs/formats that "think" differently. I know of
Amadeus an midt notably MEI where you basically write diwn what you *see*. If
not explicitly altered the actual pitch is determined by the key signature.
>
>By the way, how would one write a g natural in b major, if ‘g’ lead to
>a
>g sharp? ‘ges’? But if so, how to write a ges?
No, a g natural would be encided as a g natural, however the syntax is. E.g. gn.
Users of these systems are very convinced of it - as are we ...
Ur
>
>P.S.: There is a very ugly hack abusing modalTranspose to achieve
>something similar so that b c d e f becomes b cis dis e fis. But it
>breaks when you want to use pitches other than those from the original
>b
>major scale like above.
>
>_______________________________________________
>lilypond-user mailing list
>address@hidden
>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
- sharping naturals, Brother Gabriel-Marie, 2015/07/23
- Re: sharping naturals, Peter Bjuhr, 2015/07/24
- Re: sharping naturals, Urs Liska, 2015/07/24
- Re: sharping naturals, Peter Bjuhr, 2015/07/24
- Re: sharping naturals, Malte Meyn, 2015/07/24
Re: sharping naturals, Malte Meyn, 2015/07/23
Re: sharping naturals, Robert Schmaus, 2015/07/24