Just shortly:
I do think we'll find a good way for you, and I also think this is a
good opportunity to continue work on ScholarLY. Especially
considering that just a few days ago Craig Dabelstein also asked
about ScholarLY.
Urs
Am 09.11.2015 um 17:33 schrieb Graham
King:
I'm preparing an edition of sixteenth-century polyphony, using the
book-titling template[1]. The edition would benefit from some
footnotes/endnotes (the sort that say things like: "contratenor 1,
bar 99: semiminim A missing in MS"). How best to achieve this,
while preserving the "book-titling" appearance?
Urs' marvellous work on ScholarLy[2] appears ideal, but outputs
its annotations in Latex (and might have other problems - see
separate thread[3]). So I'm now wondering how best to integrate
this with a published score. Several possibilities present
themselves:
1) lilypond-book[4]. Requires extensive knowledge of Latex, and
appears to be targetted at presenting small snippets within
musicological papers, rather that large amounts of music with a
small number of annotations.
2) Latex with \includepdf[5].
3) musicexamples.sty[6].
4) something else?
I have used Latex (once!) and I'm prepared to do some learning,
but I'd welcome advice on the most efficient way to proceed, and
the pros-&-cons of each approach.
[1] From the Snippets Repository: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=368
[2] http://lilypondblog.org/2015/01/introducing-scholarly/
[3] lilypond-user list, November 2015: "ScholarLy and polymetric
music? (bar numbering, \RemoveEmptyStaffContext)"
[4] http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/lilypond_002dbook
[5] http://lilypondblog.org/2013/07/creating-songbooks-with-lilypond-and-latex/
[6] http://openlilylib.org/musicexamples/index.html
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
|