[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ChordNames: Brandt & Roemer exceptions
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: ChordNames: Brandt & Roemer exceptions |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Nov 2015 22:10:32 -0500 |
Hi Joram,
Thanks for the helpful response!
> I was interested in a direct comparison to the current style. That's why
> I created the attachment from your testing code.
> red = Lilypond's default style
> black = your Brandt-Roemer style
> green = differences I noticed (only once)
Very nice — thanks for doing that.
> My personal take is: nice and understandable. I like the sizes of
> accidentals and the consistent font size for numbers.
Excellent.
I would like to implement kerning, if possible.
Otherwise, I felt like I had found good basic sizes, relations, and spacing —
glad to hear you agree!
> Two questions:
> 1. Why is Cm69 (ly) = C6/9 (BR)? Where is the "MI" gone? Is it kind of
> implied? I don't see it.
ERROR! =)
Thanks for catching that; I will fix it immediately.
> 2. (I almost don't dare to ask, but) in your code, could the "MI" for
> minor be configurable such that the BR style can be used but with 'm'
> for minor? (For ignorants who want to break with a standard.)
Once a complete B&R example is done, I will be seeing how many of the elements
can be parameterized. Certainly, the minor indicator would be one (and one of
the easier ones, at that). Stay tuned.
> Thanks for your work in any case!
My pleasure. Thanks for the feedback.
Best,
Kieren.
________________________________
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: address@hidden
Re: ChordNames: Brandt & Roemer exceptions, MarcM, 2015/11/17