Re: variables in \book { }

[Noeck]

>> I don’t think that not having a proper
>> scope for each book/bookpart is a problem.
> 
> I think it is.
> 
>> So I’d vote for this change.
> 
> I vote against it.  It does not make sense that when I write

I would also say, without its own scope there is little gain and it will
just lead to more confusion. You would need the LilyPond parser in your
head to understand what will really happen. At least the 'simplified
parser' in my head would expect a scope inside the braces :)

Cheers,
Joram