[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Variable slur thickness
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: Variable slur thickness |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 09:57:59 +0100 |
2016-03-11 1:18 GMT+01:00 Sharon Rosner <address@hidden>:
>> How should it look in situations like below?
>>
>> \score {
>> { c'1( \break d') \repeat unfold 12 { d' \noBreak } c'( \break c' d' c' d') }
>> \layout {
>> \override Slur.after-line-breaking = #(variable-slur-thickness 3 10 1.4
>> 12.7)
>> }
>> }
>
>
> I created something similar to show the problem. Looks to me like this has to
> do with broken spanners but it’s really bizarre. See the enclosed files.
>
> Thanks
> Sharon
>
It's not bizarre, just how the current coding for
variable-slur-thickness works. In case of broken slurs, each part is
affected separately.
Thus again: how should it look, in cases where a broken slur has a
(very) long and a (very) short part?
Some average-thickness? Or something else?
Cheers,
Harm
- Variable slur thickness, Sharon Rosner, 2016/03/10
- Re: Variable slur thickness, tisimst, 2016/03/10
- Re: Variable slur thickness, Sharon Rosner, 2016/03/10
- Re: Variable slur thickness, tisimst, 2016/03/10
- Re: Variable slur thickness, Sharon Rosner, 2016/03/10
- Re: Variable slur thickness, Thomas Morley, 2016/03/10
- Re: Variable slur thickness, Sharon Rosner, 2016/03/10
- Re: Variable slur thickness,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: Variable slur thickness, Sharon Rosner, 2016/03/11
- Re: Variable slur thickness, Thomas Morley, 2016/03/11
- Re: Variable slur thickness, Sharon Rosner, 2016/03/11
- Re: Variable slur thickness, Thomas Morley, 2016/03/11
- Re: Variable slur thickness, tisimst, 2016/03/11
- Re: Variable slur thickness, Sharon Rosner, 2016/03/11
- Re: Variable slur thickness, Thomas Morley, 2016/03/11
- Re: Variable slur thickness, tisimst, 2016/03/10
- Re: Variable slur thickness, Malte Meyn, 2016/03/10
- Re: Variable slur thickness, tisimst, 2016/03/10