[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Capturing inconsistency in beam subdivision length
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: Capturing inconsistency in beam subdivision length |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:03:31 -0400 |
Hi Urs,
> Opinions?
I agree with Gould: (b), with the one adjustment, is superior.
> what this seems to call for is an update
> to the beaming pattern calculation, something like (an optional) "do not
> further subdivide a group that already has exactly four notes" rule. But
> somehow I'm afraid of skating on thin ice when going into that direction.
Yeah… As soon as you get into tuplets, that ice gets even thinner. :\
Not sure how to advise.
But many many thanks for you efforts in this area — it’s bound to make a huge
positive difference!
Best,
Kieren.
________________________________
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: address@hidden