|
From: | Malte Meyn |
Subject: | Re: LilyPond logo? |
Date: | Sat, 6 Aug 2016 23:23:07 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 |
Ok, I should go to bed, probably this looks silly tomorrow ... Am 06.08.2016 um 23:00 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider:
Or even: %%%% \version "2.19.46" lilypond = \markup\concat { "Lily" \hspace #-.6 \raise #.5 \rotate #170 \fontsize #-4 \musicglyph #"clefs.G" \hspace #-.5 "ond" } \markup { \with-color #red \bold "13. " "Music engraving by" \lilypond " 2.19.46—www.lilypond.org <http://2.19.xn--46www-5u3b.lilypond.org>" } %%%% 2016-08-06 22:35 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider < address@hidden>:Tests update enclosed. Cheers, Pierre 2016-08-06 21:06 GMT+02:00 Malte Meyn <address@hidden>:Am 06.08.2016 um 17:51 schrieb Malte Meyn:- #8 of course would need a pad to recognise it as a water lily rather than a generic flower; this was just a test to demonstrate a more realistic (?) positioning of petals, not a complete logo. Maybe I’ll try to add a pad.Here is an attempt to use this petal positioning in a logo. I’m not 100% happy about the center of the flower and I’m not sure how many petals one should use … but this probably depends largely on the petal shape. I think I didn’t find an optimal shape yet; maybe one also has to cheat a little bit and differ 1 degree or so from the golden angle to get better results. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list address@hidden https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |