[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: that acciaccatura issue
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: that acciaccatura issue |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Aug 2016 23:37:46 +0200 (CEST) |
> Some comments amaze me:
> "pretending to be a novice"
> "you should already know"
> "sounds like a lame excuse"
> "it isn't rocket science"
>
> Even my parents were not so patronizing!
Well, English is not my mother tongue, and I can't reply with such
elegant and polite phrases you are using, sorry. My reply was not
meant as patronization; I really try to understand where your
`inability' lies.
What hinders you *in trying* to create a minimum example?
Werner
- RE: that acciaccatura issue, (continued)
- RE: that acciaccatura issue, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2016/08/21
- Re: that acciaccatura issue, Thomas Morley, 2016/08/22
- Re: that acciaccatura issue, David Kastrup, 2016/08/22
- RE: that acciaccatura issue, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2016/08/22
- Re: that acciaccatura issue, David Kastrup, 2016/08/22
- RE: that acciaccatura issue, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2016/08/22
- Re: that acciaccatura issue, David Kastrup, 2016/08/22
- RE: that acciaccatura issue, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2016/08/22
- Re: that acciaccatura issue, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/08/22
- RE: that acciaccatura issue, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2016/08/22
- Re: that acciaccatura issue,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- RE: that acciaccatura issue, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2016/08/22
- Re: that acciaccatura issue, David Kastrup, 2016/08/23
- Re: that acciaccatura issue, Carl Sorensen, 2016/08/22
- RE: that acciaccatura issue, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2016/08/22
- Re: that acciaccatura issue, Kevin Barry, 2016/08/22
- RE: that acciaccatura issue, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2016/08/22
- Re: that acciaccatura issue, David Kastrup, 2016/08/23
- Re: that acciaccatura issue, Thomas Morley, 2016/08/22
- Message not available
- Re: that acciaccatura issue, Thomas Morley, 2016/08/23
- Re: that acciaccatura issue, David Kastrup, 2016/08/22