[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: question about minor + fourth
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: question about minor + fourth |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Aug 2016 15:56:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
> 2016-08-28 15:13 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>> Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>> ;; Question
>>> ;; why this mapping? Obviously `text' selects from this list, but why?
>>> --harm
>>> (texts
>>> (map
>>> (lambda (x) (ly:music-property x 'text))
>>> (extract-typed-music m 'text-script-event)))
>>> (text (if (null? texts) #f (if omit-root (car texts) texts))))
>>> (cons (if omit-root (cdr normalized) normalized) text)))
>>
>> Hm? This looks for text scripts and takes the first one (if any) if
>> omit-root is set (because of available rest arguments) or otherwise all
>> scripts.
>
> Well, I used some "newer" features like `extract-typed-music' to
> rewrite the code from chord-name.scm, keeping all the original's
> functionality.
> But why is this functionality there at all?
Which functionality?
> In other words: I can't imagine a use-case where it matters.
Where what matters? What exactly in the code and/or the arguments it
interprets seems strange or (currently?) unused to you?
Particularly if we want to replace this interface with a scheme function
(in LilyPond syntax) we need to figure out which parts of it are not
likely to see use anyway.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: question about minor + fourth, (continued)
- Re: question about minor + fourth, Benjamin Poly, 2016/08/27
- Re: question about minor + fourth, Benjamin Poly, 2016/08/27
- Re: question about minor + fourth, Thomas Morley, 2016/08/27
- Re: question about minor + fourth, David Kastrup, 2016/08/28
- Re: question about minor + fourth, David Kastrup, 2016/08/28
- Re: question about minor + fourth, Thomas Morley, 2016/08/28
- Re: question about minor + fourth, Benjamin Poly, 2016/08/28
- Re: question about minor + fourth, Thomas Morley, 2016/08/28
- Re: question about minor + fourth, David Kastrup, 2016/08/28
- Re: question about minor + fourth, Thomas Morley, 2016/08/28
- Re: question about minor + fourth,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: question about minor + fourth, Thomas Morley, 2016/08/28
- Re: question about minor + fourth, David Kastrup, 2016/08/28