[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Augmentation dot positioning
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Augmentation dot positioning |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Sep 2016 07:02:23 +0200 (CEST) |
> Attached with some extra cases I'd forgotten about (the inverted
> versions of the final 6.
Looks good, thanks. Please post this to the bug list so that a
bugmeister can create an issue – since the old issue was tagged as
fixed, a new one will be created.
Werner
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, (continued)
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/09/14
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Chris Yate, 2016/09/14
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Chris Yate, 2016/09/14
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Davide Liessi, 2016/09/14
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/09/14
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Chris Yate, 2016/09/14
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Chris Yate, 2016/09/14
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Chris Yate, 2016/09/14
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/09/14
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Chris Yate, 2016/09/14
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Carl Sorensen, 2016/09/15
- Message not available
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Chris Yate, 2016/09/15
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Chris Yate, 2016/09/15
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Carl Sorensen, 2016/09/15
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Carl Sorensen, 2016/09/15
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Chris Yate, 2016/09/15
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Carl Sorensen, 2016/09/15
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Chris Yate, 2016/09/15
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Chris Yate, 2016/09/15
- Re: Augmentation dot positioning, Carl Sorensen, 2016/09/15