lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Typesetting "as near to Petrucci style as possible".


From: Richard Shann
Subject: Re: Typesetting "as near to Petrucci style as possible".
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 12:06:56 +0100

On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 10:52 +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 10:37 +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> > > seems identical with or without MultiMeasureRest.style =
> > #'neomensural
> > > and indeed with  MultiMeasureRest.style = ##f too.
> > >
> > >
> > > Richard
> > 
> > 
> > Have you considered using r1 instead of R1?

For this music, where there are bar lines, r1 does not center the whole
measure rest. I've come up with the following workaround:

\version "2.19.43" 

 {
        \clef mensural-g
        \set Staff.clefPosition = #-4
        \set Staff.middleCPosition = #-8
        \set Staff.middleCClefPosition = #-8
        \override Flag.style = #'mensural
        \override NoteHead.style = #'petrucci
        \override Rest.style = #'neomensural
        \override MultiMeasureRest.style = #'neomensural
        \key g \major    \time 6/4
        r1*6/4
        \hide R1*6/4 -\tweak #'extra-offset #'(0 . -2.1)^\markup {\musicglyph 
#"rests.0neomensural"} 
        c''2. \once\override Dots.dot-count = #0 
        r2. c''2
 }
 
I wonder if there is something neater? Can I tell LilyPond to use
rests.0neomensural instead of the glyph it does use (rests.0 ?)

Richard



>   I don't know the era of
> > the 
> > music you're aiming for, but certainly up to 1600 there was no concept
> > of a 
> > multimeasure rest, since there was no measure.
> 
> Well, the Rebel is as late as 1712, and does have multi-measure rests
> (it's printed as separate parts)
> https://imslp.org/wiki/Special:ImagefromIndex/345846
> 
> I'm not sure what period the originator of this query was interested in
> - very likely earlier, this print using moveable type was old-fashioned
> at the time. But I thought it might illustrate LilyPond's flexibility to
> generate both a modern and a (somewhat) early version from the same
> Denemo input. I think it is quite impressive, but there are some style
> clashes in there.
> 
> Richard
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]