[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OOoLilyPond
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: OOoLilyPond |
Date: |
Sun, 01 Jan 2017 20:49:50 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes:
> Am 31. Dezember 2016 08:50:51 MEZ, schrieb Noeck <address@hidden>:
>>Hi,
>>
>>> IIRC it is officially unmaintained.
>>> Quite a pity ...
>>
>>If there is interest in maintaining it, I think the original author
>>would agree to do so.
>
> I think so too. IIRC it was just the usual lack of time.
>
>> I don't remember if there is a license with it,
>>but I can dig out the conversation with the author next week.
>>
>>IIUC, the extension is just a compressed (zip?) set of files, so the
>>required changes could be combined again in a compressed file and
>>published, once the license is clear. Such a best-effort maintenance
>>might be better than nothing.
>
> So it might be a good idea to move it to a repository (e.g. under
> https://github.com/openlilylib.
>
> I can do some "hosting" but not really maintain it. Especially as I
> don't use it personally (because LibreOffice can't include vector
> graphics (if that still is true)).
I think that has changed years ago already, but the last time I looked,
Oolilypond did not make any use of it.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Noeck, 2017/01/01
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Urs Liska, 2017/01/01
- Re: OOoLilyPond,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Urs Liska, 2017/01/01
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Wols Lists, 2017/01/01
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Henning Hraban Ramm, 2017/01/01
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Wols Lists, 2017/01/01
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Urs Liska, 2017/01/02
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Urs Liska, 2017/01/02
- Python LiLily (was: OOoLilyPond), Urs Liska, 2017/01/02
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Klaus Blum, 2017/01/02
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Urs Liska, 2017/01/02
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Klaus Blum, 2017/01/02