[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 13th chord?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: 13th chord? |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Feb 2017 23:08:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Rob Torop <address@hidden> writes:
> When I enter a 13th chord like this e:13, it renders with a 9 as well.
> I know a 13 chord officially contains the 9 and 11, and that lilypond
> by convention will omit the 11. But I don't really want to have the 9
> showing. Do I inadvertently have some setting on that is giving me
> this?
Minimal example:
\version "2.19.50"
\chords { e:13 }
The default chord printer is Ignatzek. No idea whether this would count
as a bug with the Ignatzek naming framework or not, and how the other
chord printers would behave in comparison.
As a default, the mismatch between input and output seems weird.
--
David Kastrup
- 13th chord?, Rob Torop, 2017/02/25
- Re: 13th chord?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: 13th chord?, David Kastrup, 2017/02/25
- Re: 13th chord?, Thomas Morley, 2017/02/25
- Re: 13th chord?, Wols Lists, 2017/02/25
- Re: 13th chord?, mskala, 2017/02/25
- Re: 13th chord?, David Kastrup, 2017/02/25