[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Regtest for issue 5181 (was: \mark and slur)
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: Regtest for issue 5181 (was: \mark and slur) |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Sep 2017 11:58:19 +0200 |
2017-09-22 12:22 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> Not putting up an issue just yet. Need to hear that you're ok with what
> amounts to scrapping your work after it helped me figure out why I
> wasn't even able to start writing something that I felt good about.
To be clear, feel free to use my suggestion or parts of it or to trash
it entirely.
All's fine with me.
Cheers,
Harm
- Regtest for issue 5181 (was: \mark and slur), (continued)
- Regtest for issue 5181 (was: \mark and slur), David Kastrup, 2017/09/22
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181 (was: \mark and slur), Thomas Morley, 2017/09/22
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181, David Kastrup, 2017/09/23
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181, David Kastrup, 2017/09/23
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/23
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/23
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181, David Kastrup, 2017/09/23
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181, David Kastrup, 2017/09/23
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/23
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181, David Kastrup, 2017/09/23
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181 (was: \mark and slur),
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/16
- How near is 2.20? [was: Re: \mark and slur], Malte Meyn, 2017/09/14
- Re: How near is 2.20? [was: Re: \mark and slur], David Kastrup, 2017/09/14
Re: \mark and slur, Gianmaria Lari, 2017/09/14
Re: \mark and slur, Phil Holmes, 2017/09/14
RE: \mark and slur, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2017/09/14