[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.19.80 restNumberThreshold
From: |
Paul Scott |
Subject: |
Re: 2.19.80 restNumberThreshold |
Date: |
Sat, 4 Nov 2017 09:38:04 -0700 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) |
On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 04:22:42PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Paul Scott <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> >> For some time restNumberThreshold has not worked for me.
> >>
> >> \version "2.19.80"
> >>
> >> \relative{
> >> c''1
> >> \set Score.restNumberThreshold = #0 R
> >> \set Score.restNumberThreshold = #1 R
> >> }
> >>
> >> This does not put a "1" over the 2nd bar. What have I missed?
> >
> > Huh. Take a look at
> >
> > \version "2.19.80"
> >
> > \relative{
> > c''1
> > \set Score.restNumberThreshold = #0 R1*3 R1*3
> > \set Score.restNumberThreshold = #1 R1*3 R1*3
> > \set Score.restNumberThreshold = #2 R1*3 R1*3
> > \set Score.restNumberThreshold = #3 R1*3 R1*3
> > }
> >
> > This looks more than weird.
>
> Actually, using \compressFullBarRests it looks sort-of reasonable.
I did remember that later. It's in my regular code.
It looks like \compressMMRests has replaced \compressFullBarRests even
though the latter still works.
Is that right?
Paul
> The
> only irritating thing is that setting the restNumberThreshold already
> affects a multimeasure rest _ending_ at the same moment. So the
> engraver should likely remember the setting active at the start of the
> (partial?) rest.
>
> --
> David Kastrup
>