[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OT] Grammatic gender
From: |
J Martin Rushton |
Subject: |
Re: [OT] Grammatic gender |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Nov 2017 22:42:16 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 |
On 17/11/17 21:28, Peter Chubb wrote:
> For interest, here's a link to a short article written by Poul
> Anderson, as if English were purged of almost all non-germanic words,
> and still used German-style compounds.
>
> Very off topic!
> https://groups.google.com/forum/message/raw?msg=alt.language.artificial/ZL4e3fD7eW0/_7p8bKwLJWkJ
>
Absolutely brilliant! Thank you.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, (continued)
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, Kieren MacMillan, 2017/11/17
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, David Wright, 2017/11/17
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, Wol's lists, 2017/11/17
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, Karlin High, 2017/11/17
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, Kieren MacMillan, 2017/11/17
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, Peter Chubb, 2017/11/17
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender,
J Martin Rushton <=
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, David Wright, 2017/11/18
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, Karlin High, 2017/11/18
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, Wols Lists, 2017/11/18
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, Henning Hraban Ramm, 2017/11/18
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, J Martin Rushton, 2017/11/17
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, mskala, 2017/11/17
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, Henning Hraban Ramm, 2017/11/16
- Re: double time signature problem, Noeck, 2017/11/15
- Re: double time signature problem, David Kastrup, 2017/11/15
- Re: double time signature problem, Karlin High, 2017/11/15