lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Scholarly question


From: Urs Liska
Subject: Re: Scholarly question
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 10:55:20 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0

Hi Craig,


Am 10.04.2018 um 01:01 schrieb Craig Dabelstein:
Hi all,

Is this the correct way to ignore critical remarks in the output file?

\ignoreAnnotationTypes #'(<critical-remark>)

No, it isn't. And while looking into the files I realize that this option isn't commented properly.

The proper command to ignore critical remarks (while producing the annotations) is

\setOption scholarly.annotate.ignored-types #'(critical-remark)

You set the corresponding option to a symbol list with all the annotation types you do *not* want to be included in the output, the values are those defined in module.ily: critical-remark, musical-issue, lilypond-issue, question, and todo.

I'll update the file to at least have this information present as comments to the option.

Urs



Thanks in advance,

Craig

--
Craig Dabelstein
Maxime's Music


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]