lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: {SPAM 01.9} Re: Tie across voices


From: Simon Albrecht
Subject: Re: {SPAM 01.9} Re: Tie across voices
Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 23:55:51 +0200

On 04.05.2018 19:23, David Sumbler wrote:
It seems that if, in a
<<{\musicA} {\musicB}>>
passage, \musicA does not specify a new Voice, then the music before
the << >> passage and, importantly, also the music afterwards will all
be treated as belonging to the same voice.  Is that correct?

Have a look at this example:

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\version "2.19.80"

<<
  c
  c
>>

\new Staff
<<
  c
  c
>>

\new Staff
<<
  c
  \\
  c
>>

\new Staff
\new Voice
<<
  c
  c
>>
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

resulting in the attached output.
<<>> just combines music expressions simultaneously. Depending on which contexts are explicitly created, separate implicit contexts will be created or not.

Best,
Simon

Attachment: Screenshot from 2018-05-04 23-54-04.png
Description: PNG image


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]