Re: Opinions requested on deprecating "annotation" commands

[Urs Liska]

Am 01.07.2018 um 20:27 schrieb N. Andrew Walsh:

Hi Urs, List

On Sun, 1 Jul 2018, 00:08 Urs Liska <address@hidden> wrote:

Hi Simon and Craig,

I think it's a good point. And since maybe I'll have to suffer more than anyone else ;-) I shouldn't wring my hands too much and just go for that.

I'll consent to slogging through all our Kayser project to update the annotations if it means getting this very excellent feature implemented.

That can serve as a litmus test for a scripted conversion ;-) Maybe we can even provide a script that assists users to update their documents like convert-ly does for regular LilyPond files.
The issue I see here is that currently we have so many open working branches, which will complicate the situation significantly. Probably we should just do the change to the scholarly.annotate.legacy module until we have merged the branches ...

Best
Urs

Cheers,

A