|
From: | Knute Snortum |
Subject: | Re: scheme with Frescobaldi |
Date: | Tue, 3 Jul 2018 05:46:03 -0700 |
Aaron Hill <address@hidden> writes:
> On 2018-06-27 08:14, Simon Albrecht wrote:
>> On 26.06.2018 03:02, Aaron Hill wrote:
>>> Here is the reference on `let` for Guile:
>>>
>>> https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Local-Bindings.html#Local-Bindings
>>
>> I guess for the time being we should stick with the Guile 1.8 manual:
>> <https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/docs-1.8/guile-ref/Local-Bindings.html#Local-Bindings>
>
> Ah, sorry about that. The new docs are always what shows up in a web
> search, and I forgot to manually adjust for the older version of Guile
> that LilyPond uses. That said, I doubt the concept of `let` has
> changed all that much since 1958. ;)
Since 1958, named let has been added. Also let* and letrec .
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |