[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Roman Numeral rehearsal marks?
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: Roman Numeral rehearsal marks? |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Oct 2018 17:07:20 +0200 |
Am Mi., 24. Okt. 2018 um 16:59 Uhr schrieb Ben <address@hidden>:
>
> On 10/24/2018 10:39 AM, David Nalesnik wrote:
> Based on my reading of scm/translation.functions.scm, I have no idea
> why the following should not work:
>
> \version "2.19.82"
>
> \relative c'' {
> \set Score.markFormatter = #(format-mark-generic '(roman box bold
> mixedcase))
> c1 \mark \default
> c1 \mark \default
> }
>
> -David
>
> _
>
>
> Hi David,
>
> When I tried your code it just gave me an error:
>
> \set Score.markFormatter = #
>
> (format-mark-generic '(roman box bold mixedcase))
>
>
> Interpreting music...
>
> warning: type check for `markFormatter' failed; value `#<unspecified>' must
> be of type `procedure'
'format-mark-generic' was implemented with
commit 16a3f70519f8f788666620acccd390f946362bcd
Author: Malte Meyn <address@hidden>
Date: Thu Dec 28 18:25:07 2017 +0100
Issue 5249/1: add a generic markFormatter function
Which is 2.21.0, probably the upcoming 2.20.0 as well, didn't check.
Cheers,
Harm
- Roman Numeral rehearsal marks?, N. Andrew Walsh, 2018/10/24
- Re: Roman Numeral rehearsal marks?, Ben, 2018/10/24
- Re: Roman Numeral rehearsal marks?, Pierre-Luc Gauthier, 2018/10/24
- Re: Roman Numeral rehearsal marks?, Ben, 2018/10/24
- Re: Roman Numeral rehearsal marks?, David Nalesnik, 2018/10/24
- Re: Roman Numeral rehearsal marks?, Ben, 2018/10/24