Re: Finetuning TextSpanner beginning and end positions?

[Stefano Troncaro]

Hi Harm, I looked at it quickly and it's an amazing change! I'm not a native speaker either but I will think about it later today and see if I can come up with any improvement of the kind you mentioned. Thank you!

El jue., 9 may. 2019 a las 20:49, Thomas Morley (<address@hidden>) escribió:

Hi Stefano,

Am Mi., 8. Mai 2019 um 05:16 Uhr schrieb Stefano Troncaro
<address@hidden>:

> my workflow in these scenarios is to go to the description of the object which is giving me trouble, see what interfaces and properties it has, and from there work out what I need to do. This is also what the Lilypond manuals suggest. So, if the purpose of the Internals Reference is "to present information precisely and concisely", for me a precise description would be at the very least to have a list of it's sub-properties.
>
> I think someone explained to me some time ago (in a similar situation with an alist of properties although I don't remember specifically with what) that this is not possible because of the way the documentation is automatically generated.

Well, putting stuff into IR is different from usual doc-work, but not
impossible.
I created
#5518 Document bound-details (sub-)properties in line-spanner-cc for IR
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5518/

Patch is up for review here:
https://codereview.appspot.com/560670043/

Descriptions are mostly taken from NR.
Though, I'm not a native speaker. Any suggestions for better wording,
grammar, syntax etc is welcome.

I think with your google-account you can log in there and do any
inline-comments you wish.

Attached, an excerpt from internals.pdf showing how it looks after patch.

Cheers,
  Harm