Re: scheme-question: matrix-operation

[Thomas Morley]

Am Mo., 4. Nov. 2019 um 01:05 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>
> Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > lets say I've a list of sublists like '((1 2 3)(4 5 6))
> > I want to modify it, the result should be '((1 3 5)(2 4 6))
> >
> > This is a matrix-operation (not sure whether matrix is the correct
> > english term), on could write it graphically:
> > 1 2 3
> > 4 5 6
> > ->
> > 1 3 5
> > 2 4 6
> >
> > What's the best scheme-way to get it?
>
> What is it that you are doing?  I don't see the principle you apply
> here.  Changing '((1 2 3)(4 5 6)) to '((1 4) (2 5) (3 6)) is an obvious
> transformation, but your single example does not really give much of an
> idea of what you do.

While trying to write a reply I came across some bad thinking of mine.
I don't need this at all.

Sorry for the noise,
  Harm