Re: Users of scholarly.choice or scholarly.editorial-markup?

[Davide Liessi]

Dear Urs,

I'm very late, but maybe you can make use of my comments independently
of the Salzburg conference.

Il giorno mar 14 gen 2020 alle ore 11:48 Urs Liska
<address@hidden> ha scritto:
> does anyone know if the openLilyLib modules scholarly.choice and
> scholarly.editorial-markup are actually used by people?

I'm using scholarly.editorial-markup (not yet scholarly.choice) in two projects.

> The reason I'm asking is that I have the impression that I should
> rename the command \editorialMarkup to something different and would
> like to know if this would significantly affect users.

Renaming the commands is fine for me, especially if it can be done
with find/replace.

> What the naming actually describes is that I *use* editorial markup to
> encode one version as a "lemma" and another as a "reading". But that's
> not what *should* be there. Actually I want to encode the versions "as"
> lemma and reading.

I agree that the command names should reflect their semantic meaning
rather than the presentation or implementation details.

Best wishes.
Davide