[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fonts for text
From: |
Wols Lists |
Subject: |
Re: Fonts for text |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:22:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 |
On 26/04/20 09:20, Noeck wrote:
>
>
> Am 26.04.20 um 09:13 schrieb Thomas Morley:
>> In "Times New Roman" the "Roman" is taken as font-family of font
>> "Times New", which does not exists, thus a fall-back font is used.
>
> What? :)
>
> (Well, I think I know some background why, but that is still really
> unexpected.)
>
What I call a chainsaw bug, not a papercut bug ...
Okay, I've only really skimmed the thread, but if you pass a valid font
name and it mis-interprets it as a font-family, that's nasty.
Down to the usual argument about "is a space part of a token, or a token
separator?", I guess ...
Cheers,
Wol
- Re: Fonts for text, (continued)
- Re: Fonts for text, Jinsong Zhao, 2020/04/25
- Re: Fonts for text, Thomas Morley, 2020/04/26
- Re: Fonts for text, Jinsong Zhao, 2020/04/26
- Re: Fonts for text, Thomas Morley, 2020/04/26
- Re: Fonts for text, Jinsong Zhao, 2020/04/26
- Re: Fonts for text, Thomas Morley, 2020/04/26
- Re: Fonts for text, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/04/26
- Re: Fonts for text, Ignacio Lois, 2020/04/26
- Re: Fonts for text, Jinsong Zhao, 2020/04/26
- Re: Fonts for text, Noeck, 2020/04/26
- Re: Fonts for text,
Wols Lists <=
- Re: Fonts for text, Thomas Morley, 2020/04/26