[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OLL
From: |
Damian leGassick |
Subject: |
Re: OLL |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Oct 2020 15:07:14 +0100 |
OLL is something that I have occasionally looked into, and something that I am
reassured to know is there: it is something that I hoped to use more in the
future. I do use notation-fonts. I have not used ScholarLy, Edition-engraver
and Analysis so far on occasions when, in hindsight, it would have been useful
simply because of the sketchy documentation. That is, I found it quicker to use
LaTex and graphics to get the job done. I doubt I’m the only one.
The thought of OLL disappearing does sadden me going forward. I am not a
scheme/C programmer but I would be happy to help by fully and finally getting
to grips with OLL and working on use-cases or documentation.
Damian
> On 10 Oct 2020, at 14:40, Andrew Bernard <andrew.bernard@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> Since Urs has stepped down from OLL work for personal reasons, as
> somebody who has written code for OLL, and contributed some snippets
> of some utility, I have been considering taking it all over. I have
> proposed to make a new domain openlilylib.space, move to Gitlab.
> establish a website on my personal Linux servers at my own expense,
> and add much more documentation and morenad try to communicate the use
> and utility of OLL to end users.
>
> I have written to a few of the members of the list and perhaps it is
> too soon but I have only heard back from one person. There have been
> no contributions for some time. And now suddenly the thread about
> licencing has risen again, a topic which I find absurd and I would
> refuse to countenance it for any OLL work ongoing that I would be
> doing. It seems that thread is trying to actively discourage OLL use.
>
> Like Urs, I get the impression that the effort on OLL is not worth the
> return, as hardly anybody seems to use it and there appears to be
> little interest. This is very disappointing. So, may I ask - it is
> worth me continuing the development and maintenance of OLL?
>
> Andrew
>
> [I am not prepared to discuss changes to GPL and anything related to
> licences.]
>
- OLL, Andrew Bernard, 2020/10/10
- Re: OLL,
Damian leGassick <=
- Re: OLL, Henning Hraban Ramm, 2020/10/10
- Re: OLL, Kieren MacMillan, 2020/10/10
- Re: OLL, Thomas Morley, 2020/10/10
- Re: OLL, Kieren MacMillan, 2020/10/10
- Re: OLL, Martín Rincón Botero, 2020/10/10
- Re: OLL, Carl Sorensen, 2020/10/10
- Re: OLL, Lukas-Fabian Moser, 2020/10/10
- Re: OLL, Peter Crighton, 2020/10/10
- Re: OLL, Kieren MacMillan, 2020/10/10
- Re: OLL, Hans Åberg, 2020/10/10