[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Articulation mark & slur placement
From: |
Mark Stephen Mrotek |
Subject: |
RE: Articulation mark & slur placement |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Dec 2020 16:49:34 -0800 |
Mike
Any requirement that the marcato to be below the note?
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr.com@gnu.org]
On Behalf Of Michael Seifert
Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2020 3:10 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Articulation mark & slur placement
The following code
\relative c' {
d4-^( e4 f4-.) r4
}
produces a slur with all articulation marks “inside” the slur. Typically,
however, articulation marks are supposed to go “outside” the first note of a
slur: “Usually, only tenuto lines and staccato marks may go inside of the
first and the last notes of a slur.” (“Behind Bars”, p. 121) If we follow
this guideline in the excerpt above, the endpoint of the slur should be closer
to the notehead than the marcato accent is. The staccato mark, on the other
hand, is correctly placed.
Is there a way to make it so that the “usual” placement occurs by default? Or
do I need to tweak this manually for each articulation mark (other than
staccato and tenuto) that begins a phrase?
Mike Seifert
- Articulation mark & slur placement, Michael Seifert, 2020/12/19
- RE: Articulation mark & slur placement,
Mark Stephen Mrotek <=
- Re: Articulation mark & slur placement, Knute Snortum, 2020/12/19
- Re: Articulation mark & slur placement, Michael Seifert, 2020/12/20
- Re: Articulation mark & slur placement, Xavier Scheuer, 2020/12/21
- Re: Articulation mark & slur placement, Thomas Morley, 2020/12/21
- Re: Articulation mark & slur placement, Xavier Scheuer, 2020/12/22