[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Terminology question
From: |
Valentin Petzel |
Subject: |
Re: Terminology question |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Nov 2021 22:40:04 +0100 |
That is somewhat correct. The *extraction* of parts is something that only
makes sense in times of computer score representation, as you’d extract a part
of the information from a full score. Before that parts would have been
separate scores prepared by the editor. So in this sense „extraction” does not
really make sense. And in the case of unpublished works you’d have a so called
copyist, which was usually some musician in the orchestra who’d hand write
parts from the full score for the whole orchestra. So this is what *copying*
would be.
Cheers,
Valentin
>
> I checked my copy of Gardner Read's Music Notation (1979). There's no
> use of "extracting" in the context of parts. He writes of "part
> preparation" and "copying." (His focus is on writing them out by
> hand.)
>
> -David N.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Terminology question, Jacques Menu, 2021/11/13
- Re: Terminology question, Kieren MacMillan, 2021/11/13
- Re: Terminology question, Phil Holmes, 2021/11/13
- Re: Terminology question, address@hidden, 2021/11/13
- Re: Terminology question, David Nalesnik, 2021/11/13
- Re: Terminology question,
Valentin Petzel <=
- Re: Terminology question, Kieren MacMillan, 2021/11/13
- Re: Terminology question, David Nalesnik, 2021/11/13
- Re: Terminology question, Leo Correia de Verdier, 2021/11/13
- Re: Terminology question, Jacques Menu, 2021/11/13
- Re: Terminology question, Kenneth Wolcott, 2021/11/13