Re: Labelled slurs

[David Kastrup]

Timothy Lanfear <timothy@lanfear.me> writes:

> When slurs overlap, I noticed that I could omit one of the slur
> labels. Can I count on this behaviour or did I just get lucky?

You can count on it.  In a manner of speaking, "unlabelled" is a label
of its own.  With regard to whether you can count on this in eternity, I
am not as sure: there may be the desire to eventually match labelled
slurs at more than Voice-level while retaining Voice-level slurs
locally.  However, I have no idea what kind of form this sort of feature
could take exactly.  Could be an explicit Staff.1 label or so that would
be required for this.

> Taking the example from the NR 1.3.2:
>
> \version "2.22.0"
>
> \fixed c' {
>   <c~ f\=1( g\=2( >2 <c e\=1) a\=2) >
>   <c~ f( g\=2( >2 <c e) a\=2) >
> }

-- 
David Kastrup