lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (Solved)Re: To get rid of the horizontal line before the footnotes?


From: Richard Shann
Subject: Re: (Solved)Re: To get rid of the horizontal line before the footnotes?
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2022 16:43:33 +0000
User-agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1

On Mon, 2022-02-07 at 15:59 +0000, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2/7/22, 8:57 AM, "lilypond-user on behalf of Richard Shann"
> <lilypond-user-bounces+carl.d.sorensen=gmail.com@gnu.org on behalf of
> richard@rshann.plus.com> wrote:
> 
>     On Mon, 2022-02-07 at 13:41 +0100, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>     > Le 05/02/2022 à 12:50, Richard Shann a écrit :
>     > > On Sat, 2022-02-05 at 11:30 +0000, Richard Shann wrote:
>     > > > Is there a way to drop the line that is drawn below the
> systems
>     > > > above
>     > > > the footnotes?
>     > > Sorry for asking before searching the mailing-list archives,
>     > > 
>     > > \paper { footnote-separator-markup = ##f }
>     > > 
>     > > is the answer I see. The docs often still defeat me, just too
> much
>     > > stuff :(
>     > 
>     > 
>     > 
>     > How about using the indices? Looking at
>     > 
>     >
> https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.22/Documentation/notation/lilypond-index.html#lilypond-index_cp_letter-F
>     > 
>     > around 'footnote' directs you to 'footnote-separator-markup'
>     > immediately.
>     
>     Thanks-
>         It's good that it's there - I often look in those indices to
>     try and track things down; what that entry leads to is an entry
> in a
>     section called "Miscellaneous paper variables", I must have
> missed it.
>     I wonder if that entry in that section would be better placed in
> the
>     section on footnotes 
>     
>    
> https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.22/Documentation/notation/creating-footnotes
>     
>     I gave this section a good read. I noticed it did document
> annotation-
>     line which I picked up on when I was implementing footnotes in
> Denemo
>     some years ago, but no mention of the footnote-separator ...
> 
> The footnote-separator markup is listed in the first paragraph of the
> page on the link you sent.

ha, I see I linked to 2.22 but I had been reading 2.20 :( 
nice to know that the docs are improving as always.

Richard





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]