lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bar count not displayed after partial measure followed by forced lin


From: Kenneth Wolcott
Subject: Re: bar count not displayed after partial measure followed by forced line break
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 22:42:00 -0800

Hi Brian;

  Thank you for your patience with me.

  I found the 2.23.6-1 doc tarball, downloaded it and made a web
browser bookmark to it just like I did for 2.22.1 docs.

  I then carefully read section 1.2.5, looking for my situation.

  Since I am printing bar numbers in the default manner, the first
measure of each line (except for the very first measure) is given a
bar number.

  So I now understand that it might seem weird for a partial measure
to get a bar number; and that it should be parenthesized in order to
be sure that it was specifically intended.

  I am now about to attempt implementing the snippet provided into my engraving.

Thank you,
Ken

On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 9:15 PM Brian Barker <b.m.barker@btinternet.com> wrote:
>
> At 14:36 20/02/2022 -0800, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
> >I'm not sure I totally understand your response.
>
> Evidently so.
>
> >I'd like to see the bar number displayed on the next line as that is
> >when the incomplete measure is completed.
>
> What, please, makes you think I didn't understand that?
>
> >I indeed hope that with the next release I'll be able to have the
> >bar number displayed automatically or have a mechanism to force it
> >to be displayed.
>
> And why do you not think that the snippet I identified does that for
> you? (You don't need any new releases.)
>
> As I said, the 2.23 Notation Reference (which you can easily look up)
> explains the situation at 1.2.5 Bars. It even provides a snippet that
> shows you what to do. (I even confirmed that the technique and
> snippet work in your version 2.22, despite not appearing in the 2.22
> documentation.) What happened when you tried that snippet or
> incorporated it into your work?
>
> Brian Barker
>
>
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]