lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: `TextSpanner` vs. `DynamicTextSpanner`


From: Jean Abou Samra
Subject: Re: `TextSpanner` vs. `DynamicTextSpanner`
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 20:39:33 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0

Le 03/03/2022 à 20:25, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
For `DynamicTextSpanner` grobs there exists the auxiliary
`DynamicLineSpanner` grob, providing a vertical baseline to align
successive dynamic grobs within a staff.  LilyPond provides other such
pairs like `CenteredBarNumber` vs. `CenteredBarNumberLineSpanner`, or
`SostenutoPedal` vs. `SostenutoPedalLineSpanner`.

Is there a similar auxiliary grob for `TextSpanner`?


No, since consecutive text spanners are not aligned
vertically.


{
  c'1\tweak bound-details.left.text "aaa" \startTextSpan
  c'1\stopTextSpan\tweak bound-details.left.text "aaaa"\startTextSpan
  c'1\stopTextSpan
}


Maybe they should be for tempo indications? But then,
it's more a matter of adding dedicated grobs since
I don't think it would be desirable to do this for
all text spanners -- nothing prevents overlapping
text spanners, unlike, say, overlapping hairpins (in
the same voice, that is), so I don't think there is
a reason to make them continuous.

What is the context of your question?

Jean




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]