[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: programming error for thickness/control-points of Slur
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: programming error for thickness/control-points of Slur |
Date: |
Fri, 27 May 2022 13:28:14 +0200 |
Am Fr., 27. Mai 2022 um 11:58 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley
<thomasmorley65@gmail.com>:
>
> Am Fr., 27. Mai 2022 um 11:22 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley
> <thomasmorley65@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > lsr-snippet "Variable bow thickness depending on length"
> > https://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=1028 looks at 'control-points
> > to calculate a modified thickness.
> >
> > For recent lily-versions this throws
> > programming error: cyclic dependency: calculation-in-progress
> > encountered for Slur.thickness
> > as soon as 'control-points are called in a thickness-override.
> >
> > Stripped down example:
> >
> > \version "2.23.9"
> >
> > {
> > \override Slur.thickness =
> > #(lambda (grob)
> > ;; all of below trigger the programming error
> > (ly:slur::calc-control-points grob)
> > ;(ly:grob-property grob 'control-points)
> > ;((assoc-get 'control-points (ly:grob-basic-properties grob)) grob)
> > 2)
> >
> > b1( b')
> > }
> >
> > I think I can make it work with an override for 'after-line-breaking
> > (calling 'control-points, set 'thickness to the result of calculations
> > based on the 'control-points and finally redo setting
> > 'control-points).
> >
> > Is there a better way?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Harm
>
> Btw, the snippet-description says " bow length is estimated by
> calculating the linear distance between its endpoints".
> Is it worth the effort to calculate the real bow-length?
>
> Thanks,
> Harm
I decided to go for a better approximation of the bow-length, but
dropped some comments what to do, if execution time gets worse.
https://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=1028
Cheers,
Harm
Re: programming error for thickness/control-points of Slur, Thomas Morley, 2022/05/27