[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi
From: |
Jacques Menu |
Subject: |
Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi |
Date: |
Fri, 2 Sep 2022 23:52:21 +0200 |
Hello folks,
> Le 2 sept. 2022 à 23:46, J Martin Rushton <martinrushton56@btinternet.com> a
> écrit :
>
> On Fri, 2022-09-02 at 16:17 -0500, David Wright wrote:
>> On Fri 02 Sep 2022 at 21:43:25 (+0100), J Martin Rushton wrote:
>>> I've just spent another couple of hours clearing out previous
>>> attempts
>>> to get Frescobaldi running and attempting to sort out its
>>> dependency
>>> hell.
>>>
>>> Is there any alternative to Frescobaldi?
>>
>> An editor (emacs) + LilyPond + PDF viewer (xpdf).
>> (My choices in parentheses.)
>>
>>> I'm running AlmaLinux 8.6 if that helps.
>>
>> Not a great deal; does it mean that F~ isn't part of the
>> distribution?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> David.
> My preference is for vi, but yes, that's what I've been using for the
> last couple of years since F~ stopped working. What I miss though is
> the back link from the score to the source, and the MIDI playback.
Is it known why F~ stopped working and wasn’t fixed?
JM
Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi, Andrew Bernard, 2022/09/02
Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi, Davide Liessi, 2022/09/03
Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/09/03