[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi
From: |
J Martin Rushton |
Subject: |
Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi |
Date: |
Sat, 03 Sep 2022 18:13:11 +0100 |
On Sun, 2022-09-04 at 00:52 +1000, Andrew Bernard wrote:
> Using Alma Linux 9 I can get Frescobaldi running with flatpak. I
> just
> installed it - no messing around. See attached image.
>
> Have not tried Alma Linux 8.6.
>
> I have not hammered it to test but the fact that it works is
> something.
> You can seen in the images there are some errors on the terminal.
> But
> I'd rather fiddle with source to address those than build F from
> source,
> which is still ridiculously hard with so many python stumbling
> blocks,
> even when using Qt5.
>
> Andrew
>
Well that seems to work now after a fashion. I don't know if it was
the 52 packages I installed via dnf, two packages via pip3 (pip doesn't
work) or linking qmake -> qmake-qt5. MIDI still isn't producing any
sound, but that may well be local configuration.
Anyhow, thanks very much. I've added it to the menu system and it runs
up happily without a VT. Just in time for a competition I've tried for
in the past, but didn't manage to get a decent score last year.
Kind regards,
Martin
--
J Martin Rushton MBCS
- Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi, (continued)
Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/09/03
Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi, Andrew Bernard, 2022/09/03
- Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi,
J Martin Rushton <=
- Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi, Guy Stalnaker, 2022/09/03
- Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi, J Martin Rushton, 2022/09/03
- Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi, Silvain Dupertuis, 2022/09/04
- Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi, Thomas Morley, 2022/09/04
- Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi, Adam M. Griggs, 2022/09/04
Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi, Andrew Bernard, 2022/09/04