|
From: | Mark Mathias |
Subject: | Re: jeté |
Date: | Wed, 25 Jan 2023 20:28:25 -0500 |
On 25/01/2023 22:57, Martín Rincón Botero wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> is there any way to make this markup mockup of a jeté symbol into a
> proper articulation (so that Lilypond knows how to give it an
> appropriate direction, f. ex.)? I suspect a Scheme workaround might be
> possible :-).
>
> \markup \undertie ....
> \markup \overtie ....
>
> Or is it something that needs to be baked into the font? Btw., "jeté"
> is part of the SMuFL standard. See
> http://www.smufl.org/version/1.2/range/stringTechniques/. It would be
> nice to add a symbol for this to Lilypond by default.
Try
\version "2.24.0"
jetéMarkup = \markup \undertie \pad-x #0.3 \pattern #4 #X #0.2 \musicglyph "dots.dot"
\layout {
\context {
\Score
scriptDefinitions =
#(acons 'jeté
`((padding . 0.5)
(direction . ,DOWN)
(stencil
. ,(lambda (grob)
(grob-interpret-markup
grob
(if (eqv? DOWN (ly:grob-property grob 'direction))
jetéMarkup
#{ \markup \scale #'(1 . -1) \jetéMarkup #})))))
default-script-alist)
}
}
jeté = #(make-music 'ArticulationEvent 'articulation-type 'jeté)
{
c'\jeté c'^\jeté c'_\jeté
}
It would be nice if you could spell that as
scriptDefinitions.jeté = ...
but infrastructure for nested context properties is not implemented yet,
unlike grob properties where you can do
\override Grob.property.subproperty = foo.
Best,
Jean
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |