|
From: | Volodymyr Prokopyuk |
Subject: | Re: Definition of repeats using segno and coda |
Date: | Sun, 26 Feb 2023 21:46:42 +0100 |
Good evening, Jean,I've used the suggested repeat structure (see the attached code), but it does not produce the desired result (see the attached PDF). Sorry for not being compliant with the minimal example requirement.By imperative instructions I mean not using the proposed code structure for repeats, but instead using explicit \codaMark and a literal text D.C. ... al Coda in the appropriate places in the code.I'm using Lilypond 2.24.0.Thank you,VladOn Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 8:51 PM Jean Abou Samra <jean@abou-samra.fr> wrote:Le dimanche 26 février 2023 à 20:39 +0100, Volodymyr Prokopyuk a écrit :
Hi,
I'd like to find out the right way to define repeats using segno and coda.
**Desired output written in scores
**Section A { ^codaMark } Section B { _D.C. al codaMark a poi la Coda } { ^Coda } Section C
Order of sections to play
Section A => Section B => Section A => Section CQuestions
- What is the minimal code structure to declaratively implement the above repeat order? I guess the \repeat segno and \alternatives will be used
This works for me:
\version "2.24.1" mus = { \repeat segno 2 { a'1 1 1 \alternative { \volta 1 { b'1 1 1 } \volta 2 { \section \sectionLabel "Coda" } } } c''1 1 1 } { \mus }
- Is there a way to imperatively instruct the { _D.C. al codaMark a poi la Coda } repeat instruction?
What do you mean by “imperatively instruct”?
Regards,
Jean
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |