[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
DocumentFonts
From: |
Jeff Kingston |
Subject: |
DocumentFonts |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Jan 1994 08:14:33 +1100 |
From address@hidden Tue Jan 4 04:29:30 1994
Received: by joyce.cs.su.OZ.AU with postie; Tue, 4 Jan 1994 04:29:30 +1100
Received: by basser.cs.su.oz.au with MHSnet; Tue, 04 Jan 1994 04:29:28 +1100
Received: from cs.brown.edu by MHSnet id 3h83M64k-+83Lv; Tue, 04 Jan 1994
04:29:27 +1100
Received: from cs.brown.edu (insecurely) by joyce.cs.su.OZ.AU;
Tue, 04 Jan 1994 04:29:28 +1100
Received: from rocky31.cs.brown.edu by cs.brown.edu (5.64+/Bullwinkle-1.7)
id AA02336; Mon, 3 Jan 94 12:29:24 -0500
Received: by rocky.cs.brown.edu (5.64+/BrownCS-1.2)
id AA15996; Mon, 3 Jan 94 12:29:24 -0500
Resent-Date: Mon, 3 Jan 94 18:28:49 +0100
Resent-Message-Id: <address@hidden>
Old-Return-Path: <address@hidden>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 94 18:28:49 +0100
From: address@hidden (Hadmut Danisch)
Message-Id: <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Subject: DocumentFonts
Resent-From: address@hidden
X-Mailing-List: <address@hidden> archive/latest/99
X-Loop: address@hidden
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: address@hidden
Hello,
I was wondering why Lout is not printing a
%%DocumentFonts line. The code is commented out
in Procedure PrintClose in z24.c. Is there any
special reason for commenting it out?
Thanks
Hadmut
Lout attempts to conform to Version 3 of the Document Structuring
Conventions as described in "PostScript Language Reference Manual
Second Edition". On page 662 it states that DocumentNeededResources
should be used instead of DocumentFonts.
Conformance is not perfect at present but it is close.
Jeff Kingston
- DocumentFonts, Hadmut Danisch, 1994/01/03
- DocumentFonts,
Jeff Kingston <=