[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
is there something like "{} @Scale" that fits vertically?
From: |
Greg A. Woods |
Subject: |
is there something like "{} @Scale" that fits vertically? |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Jul 1997 21:19:07 -0400 (EDT) |
I've been fighting again with @Scale and friends trying to fit an
@IncludeGraphic (EPSF) into an available vertical space.
I finally read the phrase in the Expert's guide that turned on the
missing light for me -- i.e. "Lout will scale the object by a common
factor _horizontally_ so as to occupy all available horizontal space."
I think I've missed this fine point from the very first day I used lout!
I've been fighting to scale something by a common factor to fill all
available _vertical_ space!
Now in a procedural language I'd simply discover the factor used by
@VScale to fit the object and then also apply that factor to @HScale the
object (or of course if I could discover the factor without applying the
@VScale then I'd just use that factor with @Scale}.
In lout though I'd suspect what I'm looking for is something like
@VHScale (where the current "{} @Scale"" might be equivalent to
@HVScale). I.e. the first letter of the operator would indicate which
direction the expansion was attempted, and the resulting scale factor
would be applied to the object both vertically and horizontally.
A quick look at the C code suggested I didn't have the time, energy, or
understanding necessary to add such a feature myself....
Perhaps there's a way to do what I wish without C coding though. Does
anyone have any clues for me?
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 443-1734 VE3TCP <address@hidden> <robohack!woods>
Planix, Inc. <address@hidden>; Secrets of the Weird <address@hidden>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- is there something like "{} @Scale" that fits vertically?,
Greg A. Woods <=