Re: Latin 2 problem

[Jeff Kingston]

On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 17:38:08 +0400, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:
  > 
  > On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 14:05:14 +0200, Michael Piotrowski wrote:
  > 
  > > > There seems to be one letter I can't get in my latin2 documents. I
  > > > think it's eth. The letter should look like a 'd' with a short
  > > > horizontal line through the top part of the vertical line. Right now
  > > > I'm getting a similar but not quite right symbol. I could put pictures
  > > > somewhere on the web if someone is interested. 
  > > 
  > > I guess you're getting eth, but you really want dcroat (in some fonts
  > > it's called dbar); while the uppercase letters Eth and Dcroat look
  > > identical, the lowercase letters are quite different.  Lout's
  > > LtLatin2.LCM encoding contains eth instead of dcroat, so you first
  > > would have to change this.
  > 
  > Yes, the correct glyph names according to Adobe's glyph list are
  > Dcroat/dcroat - the  should be fixed.
  > 
  > PS: Marko, have you submitted your Croatian data to Jeff?
  > 
  > SY, Uwe
  > -- 
  > address@hidden                         |       Zu Grunde kommen
  > http://www.ptc.spbu.ru/~uwe/            |       Ist zu Grunde gehen

I've substituted dcroat for both occurrences of eth, and Dcroat for
both occurrences of Eth, in LtLatin2.LCM for the next release.  I hope
I don't now hear from irate eth users - what will I do then?

Jeff