[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Feature request---Lines.
From: |
Jeff Kingston |
Subject: |
Re: Feature request---Lines. |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Dec 2001 08:43:34 +1100 |
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 11:39:22 +0000, Mark Summerfield wrote:
>
> Lout has @FullWidthRule (and @LocalWidthRule).
>
> But I can't see a straightforward way to do lines with dots, dashes,
> etc. (I can think of ways of doing it, but none that are nice and
> easy.) Both these symbols has a linewidth option; would it be possible
> to have a character option that defaulted to '-' (which signified a pure
> line), but that offered '=' (a double line), or a character or symbol of
> the user's choice in which case that symbol would be used?
>
> --
> Mark.
Ahem - am I allowed to say that
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
is not a very tasteful thing to put in a document? It would be easy
to add, but do we really want it?
To get a double rule you could put this in your mydefs file:
def @DoubleFullWidthRule
{
@FullWidthRule
//0.2c
@FullWidthRule
}
To get a line of + signs or whatever you could put this in your
mydefs file:
def @LineOf right x
{
x & @LineOf x
}
It's similar to the @Leaders symbol used in tables of contents. I
haven't tested either of these definitions but they are straightforward.
Jeff Kingston