[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PDF output
From: |
Jeff Kingston |
Subject: |
Re: PDF output |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Jun 2007 07:45:54 +1100 |
> I no longer need Lout, because I discovered
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/halibut
> which has more output formats.
I took a look at this. It translates a TeX-like markup language
to plain text, html, pdf, postScript, man pages, info pages,
and a couple of Windows formats. It's advertised as being for
documentation so it probably doesn't do equations, diagrams, etc.,
although I didn't penetrate deeply enough to find out for sure.
>From the tone I suspect that the features have been implemented
one by one, rather than on top of a kernel like Lout is. That
will work in a restricted application like documentation, but
not in general document formatting. I don't think the author
would dispute that, he makes a similar comparison with TeX.
Jeff
- PDF output, Robert Riebisch, 2007/06/17
- Re: PDF output,
Jeff Kingston <=